Make your own free website on Tripod.com








mysterious_t_18436.gif

Evidence Against













Home | Contact Me





Back
















     Now that you have read, hopefully, "Evidence For," now I present to you, Evidence Against the Loch Ness Monster. Here are some of my reasons why that Nessie if fake:
     Firstly, how is it possible, that a 30 to 40 foot long reptile, who has survived 1500 years, not been caught yet. To survive more than 1500 years, they would have to reproduce, therefore, currently, there has to be at least 10 or 12 of these animals in the Loch, right now.
     Secondly, years or radar searching, netting, and trigger sensative underwater cameras have come up with nothing. Could a simple minded animal fool technology? Could i fool you?
     Thirdly, the amount of fish in the Loch is hardly enough to feed 20 large, hungry, heavy, reptiles. They would have to feed on practicaly everything to survive. How do they do it?
     Fourthly, large 20-40 feet long Oarfish, which are often mistaken for sea monsters, have been found in the loch. Oarfish can attack humans. Is this Nessie.
     Finally, what are the chances that a dinosaur would survive whatever killed 90% of land animals, fried and froze the sea animals and fish, and all but killed most reptile-mammal hyprids? Almost none. What are the chances that I could roll 3 on a die? 1 in 6.